Re: getting on a longer release cycled

[Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>]

Le jeudi 07 septembre 2006, à 19:32, Don Scorgie a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 11:24 -0700, David Trowbridge wrote:
> > What in particular isn't possible with the 6-month cycle?
> 
> For one thing: the documentation gets squeezed.  We (the doc team) have,
> basically, 3 month to document all the changes, update all the docs and
> add any new documentation needed.  The doc team is currently running at
> skeleton staff and is working right up until the tarball submission
> deadline.  This knocks on and means that the doc translations (if
> present) are invariably a release behind.

I don't get this. If we move to a longer release cycle, then it will be
longer to add more features/changes. And you'll still have 3 months to
document even more changes...

Vincent

-- 
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.