Re: getting on a longer release cycled

What in particular isn't possible with the 6-month cycle?


On 9/7/06, Pat Suwalski <pat suwalski net> wrote:
Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> I would like to suggest at one point to try to break with the 6 month release
> schedule of Gnome to do a "major" release with a certain number of feature
> that would involve possible infrastructure changes in the platform.

I have been thinking about this as well, just from observing how "shit
hits the fan" near the end of the cycle.

I'd like to throw out a suggestion that perhaps GNOME should alternate
on a six-month-twelve-month release cycle, regardless of "major release"
or not. It might make planning a little more complicated, but I'm sure
it would be appreciated by developers and users alike.

desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]