Re: Mono bindings a blessed dependency? [Was: Tomboy in 2.16]
- From: Luca Ferretti <elle uca libero it>
- To: Jamie McCracken <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk>
- Cc: Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>, David Neary <dneary free fr>, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Mono bindings a blessed dependency? [Was: Tomboy in 2.16]
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:21:02 +0200
Il giorno gio, 20/04/2006 alle 22.43 +0100, Jamie McCracken ha scritto:
> Luis Villa wrote:
> > But lets be honest here. This discussion isn't about tomboy. We need
> > built in search; we're getting some of our best reviews in ages
> > because of our (currently optional) built in search:
>
> well there's a huge problem with that - the memory usage of beagle would
> mean only high end machines would be able to run it. Tracker gives us a
> better alternative IMHO for integrated search as it rocks for *everyone*
> and not just the few.
>
I agree. Beagle is good, but Tracker is divine. It needs only plain C
and 5~8 MB of RAM, and it's really really fast (the nautilus frontend is
2x faster listing search results). Oh, it's a freedesktop project.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]