Re: gtk-engines photographed eating children
- From: Thomas Wood <thos gnome org>
- To: GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: gtk-engines photographed eating children
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:00:16 +0000
Jeff Waugh wrote:
No, that's why gtk does not depend on gkt-engines, but has it's own
default engine (and now the pixmap engine too).
<quote who="Thomas Wood">
a) Why do we have two packages for themes again? Why can't these all be
Because gtk-engines is not used exclusively by GNOME.
Sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me...
serious? Why move things around at all, in that case? Industrial is
by everything that uses GTK+...
The theme engine version numbers have never changed, just the version of
the package they have been put together in.
b) Versioning gtk-engines with GNOME, as it's no longer maintained
Regardless of the fact that you've now reduced the only version number
matters (upstream source tarball version) of these theme engines?
Andrew is already explaining this, so apologies for splitting the
thread. Please don't reply to this e-mail.
] [Thread Prev