Re: GNOME Printing

On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 01:27, James Henstridge wrote:

> The only other question I have about this setup is whether the CUPS 
> maintainers are likely to accept the patch, 

That's an unknown at present.  It's still changing, so I haven't
proposed it for inclusion.

> or if all Gnome distributors 
> would need to ship patched versions of CUPS.

Another alternative as I mentioned originally is for libgnomeprint to
signal eggcups with the job ids.  That way you get notification for
GNOME applications, but not e.g. lpr.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]