On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 01:27, James Henstridge wrote: > The only other question I have about this setup is whether the CUPS > maintainers are likely to accept the patch, That's an unknown at present. It's still changing, so I haven't proposed it for inclusion. > or if all Gnome distributors > would need to ship patched versions of CUPS. Another alternative as I mentioned originally is for libgnomeprint to signal eggcups with the job ids. That way you get notification for GNOME applications, but not e.g. lpr.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part