Re: remove libgtop_names ?

Le dimanche 05 décembre 2004 à 19:15 +0100, Torsten Schoenfeld a écrit :
> On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 12:39 -0500, Curtis Hovey wrote:
> Yeah, agreed.  Every library should strive to stay API compatible.

well, what is an API ? if it's everything in public headers,
libgtop_names is. But if an API is something __documented__, maintained
and used, libgtop_names is not.

Benoît Dejean
JID: TazForEver jabber org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]