Re: remove libgtop_names ?

[Mark McLoughlin <markmc redhat com>]

Hi,

On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 19:43 +0100, Beno�Dejean wrote:
> Le dimanche 05 d�mbre 2004 �9:15 +0100, Torsten Schoenfeld a �it :
> > On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 12:39 -0500, Curtis Hovey wrote:
> > 
> > Yeah, agreed.  Every library should strive to stay API compatible.
> 
> well, what is an API ? if it's everything in public headers,
> libgtop_names is. But if an API is something __documented__, maintained
> and used, libgtop_names is not.

	You're realy making things difficult for yourself here :-)

	The library was never installed, so nobody could have used it whether
it was in the headers or not ... so its not something to worry about
IMHO ...

Cheers,
Mark.