Re: Font Configuration Applet
- From: Markus Bertheau <twanger bluetwanger de>
- To: Samuel Abels <newsgroups debain org>
- Cc: "desktop-devel-list gnome org" <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Font Configuration Applet
- Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 00:43:52 +0100
В Вск, 05/12/2004 в 00:28 +0100, Samuel Abels пишет:
> On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 23:22, Markus Bertheau wrote:
> > Remove application font, desktop font and window title font in favour of
> > one preference. For window titles that font is used in bold.
>
> As for the Desktop font: No way. Do not touch it. A nice desktop font
> has to be different from the application font, if only for the size.
Maybe for the size, but I'm not convinced of that. Maybe just use the
general font in a bigger size for that (without a preference). What
persona needs a desktop font different from the application font?
> For the window title fonts... maybe. Though there are probably themes
> out there that are designed for other fonts.
When it's eye candy vs. less preferences, I think less preferences is
more important. The window title font and the desktop font preferences
can probably be left in gconf easily, as that code is already there.
> Also, remember that some
> fonts do not have "bold".
That's a problem of these fonts and maybe distributions should not ship
such fonts. Fonts the user added don't count - if they don't have bold,
then the window title will just not be bold.
> We always need to make compromises between
> "how much candy do we add" and "how much choice do we need". I do not
> know whether five fonts are too much, but four looks perfectly
> acceptable to me.
I think four is too much already.
> > In my opinion the four variants for anti aliasing should also be reduced
> > to two: LCD or not. Of course it would be better if this could be auto
> > detected.
>
> I guess the availability of a "Monochrome" rendering is rather a
> technical reason (like, monochrome monitors, though I'm not sure whether
> we actually still support this) then eye-candy, so that would leave us
> with at least three options - monochrome, LCD and non-LCD.
I'm not sure if that's the reason for the existence of the monochrome
option. I doubt it. It's maybe just for those that don't want
antialiasing.
--
Markus Bertheau <twanger bluetwanger de>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]