Re: 2.2 was a *five* month process [Was: 2.3 Proposed Features]


On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 20:56:24 +1100
Jeff Waugh wrote:

> I'd just like to point out that the 7.5 months figure is not correct. The
> "official" 2.2 development period ran from around September 6th to February
> 5th. That's *FIVE* months almost to the day.

oopsy ;-)
> The reason why we had a shorter development period is because we spent a lot
> of time on the three post-2.0 point releases.

Did we actually suffer from that?
Sounds to me that from now on, there won't be any 2.2.x releases anymore ;-)


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]