Re: background/font capplets



On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 08:36, Luis Villa wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 23:38, Seth Nickell wrote:
> > Because the rewrite was done more than a month and a half ago.
> 
> I didn't really intend to get myself involved in what could turn into
> something nasty :/ but from the perspective of releasing and testing it
> doesn't matter when it was written, only when it was released to
> testers.

the rationale is at the beginning of the thread.

basically havoc saying, the bg crapplet sucks and we have this better
one, why are we shooting ourselves in the foot by not using it?

jacob
-- 



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]