On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 20:13, Seth Nickell wrote: > > On the subject of the background capplet, I do not object to changing > > the schemas and cleaning up the UI, but I want to see two separate > > patches: one for each of those tasks. The schemas patch will most likely > > go right in, while the UI patch will require a bit of tweaking on my > > part before I approve it. So far, this style of presentation has not > > been forthcoming. > > This is silly. It means porting the existing background capplet to the > new schemas, a non-trivial task. The new background capplet is basically > a rewrite, and is compatible with the new schemas. "Seperating" the > schemas patch from the ui patch essentially means rewriting both pieces > of code, because they aren't really separable. > > Please voice your supposed complaints about the combined patch and I'll > try to resolve the issues. If you had just done that in the first place > (weeks ago!!!) this could have *easily* been resolved by now. I'm sorry it's more work for you, but that is the only condition under which I will accept the patch. > -Seth > -- ======================================================================== Bradford Hovinen Hacker http://primates.ximian.com/~hovinen/ Ximian Desktop team hovinen ximian com Ximian, Inc. Now what is history? It is the centuries of systematic explorations of the riddle of death, with a view to overcoming death. That's why people discover mathematical infinity and electromagnetic waves, that's why they write symphonies. - Boris Pasternak, Doctor Zhivago
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part