Re: Sqlite Bindings Update

[Joe Shaw <joeshaw novell com>]

Hi again.

On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 13:02 -0500, Joe Shaw wrote:
> I've attached a mail from Daniel from January which explains the state
> of the fork at the time and why it was originally done.  I don't know
> what the current state of the upstream code is in, but on-demand row
> retrieval is absolutely essential considering the data sets we are
> using.  It's probably worthwhile reviewing the upstream code and getting
> in touch with Joshua about merging it in upstream if it hasn't already
> happened.

I should also point out that Daniel did update the tree in early
February against what was upstream at the time, and he still had to
forward-port the read-on-demand optimization.

Joe