Re: Holes in GNOME 3 process



From: Frederic Peters <fpeters gnome org>

> Piñeiro wrote:
> 
>> > The main problem with the build slaves is that there are none ...
>> > We really need to make it easier to add new ones.
>> > 
>> > I tried, and failed.
>> 
>> Yes, you are right, the current documentation has some holes. I
>> remember your attemp to add a new machine [1].
> 
> The problem was actually not to get the slave going, but to get it
> connected to build.gnome.org, as there's still a firewalling issue.
> 
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621236 and I notice now
> Christer added some comments, so first thing is certainly to answer
> them... I'll try to do that tomorrow.

Oh, yes, you are right. I was thinking about the outdated doc, but it
is true that this was the definitive reason.

BR

===
API (apinheiro igalia com)


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]