Re: Holes in GNOME 3 process

[Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>]

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Piñeiro <apinheiro igalia com> wrote:

> So, if you are suggesting a feature to avoid showing the non running
> slaves, I think that the current status is better.
>
> But, as RHEL5 is not a build-slave anymore by purpose, and we don't
> have news from the other build-slaves for ages, I agree that those
> shouldn't appear. I will try to contact the maintainers of these
> slaves, and meanwhile remove those machines from the master build-slave list.
>

The main problem with the build slaves is that there are none ...
We really need to make it easier to add new ones.

I tried, and failed.