Re: Holes in GNOME 3 process

[Piñeiro <apinheiro igalia com>]

From: Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>

> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Piñeiro <apinheiro igalia com> wrote:
> 
>> So, if you are suggesting a feature to avoid showing the non running
>> slaves, I think that the current status is better.
>>
>> But, as RHEL5 is not a build-slave anymore by purpose, and we don't
>> have news from the other build-slaves for ages, I agree that those
>> shouldn't appear. I will try to contact the maintainers of these
>> slaves, and meanwhile remove those machines from the master build-slave list.
>>
> 
> The main problem with the build slaves is that there are none ...
> We really need to make it easier to add new ones.
> 
> I tried, and failed.

Yes, you are right, the current documentation has some holes. I
remember your attemp to add a new machine [1].

Update that section should be the first item on build-brigade TODO
(TODO that is right now also outdated).

BR

[1] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/build-brigade-list/2010-June/msg00000.html

===
API (apinheiro igalia com)