Re: Forwarding options

[Marco van Oostende <marco oostende nl>]

Ah, now I figured out why it confused me. It indeed sends the original part  
of the message as attachment, which is good. My problem was that it does not  
show as a second attachment in this attachment field, so you won't be  
informed. The only way to see it work is sending myself mail...

Thanks,
Marco

On 2003.09.24 22:21, Willem Riede wrote:
> On 2003.09.24 13:55, Peter Bloomfield wrote:
> > Hi Marco!
> >
> > On 09/24/2003, Marco van Oostende wrote:
> > > Hi Peter,
> > >
> > > Forwarding with attach as it is now doesn't quote the original
> > > message on my machine. I feel this should be the case though,
> > > just like a reply works now.
> >
> > I believe that forwarding attached is designed to handle the
> > attached message much like attaching a file: no quoting or other
> > changes.
> >
> > > Regarding the forward with inline, I tried it on several memos.
> > > I read your words, but I don't understand them in the fact that
> > > they should do other things than a regular forward, it works
> > > the same for me. What;s the difference, and are both versions
> > > really required?
> > >
> > > Marco
> >
> > I was thinking of the case where someone sends you a spreadsheet
> > or (ugh!) a M$Word document as an attachment--you wouldn't want
> > to have it inline.
> 
> No, but you (at least I) would expect that attachment to become an
> attachment to the new e-mail, which would have the body of the
> original message quoted inline.
> 
> Reagrds, Willem Riede.
> _______________________________________________
> balsa-list mailing list
> balsa-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
>