Re: Forwarding options

[Marco van Oostende <marco oostende nl>]

Hi Peter,

Forwarding with attach as it is now doesn't quote the original message on my  
machine. I feel this should be the case though, just like a reply works now.

Regarding the forward with inline, I tried it on several memos. I read your  
words, but I don't understand them in the fact that they should do other  
things than a regular forward, it works the same for me. What;s the  
difference, and are both versions really required?

Marco

-----------------

On 2003.09.24 18:14, Peter Bloomfield wrote:
> On 09/24/2003, Marco van Oostende wrote:
>> I always wondered why forwarding a message with attachment never included  
>> both the message -and- the attachments, as it does in most other mail apps  
>> I worked with, but I'm sure that is a result of a discussion from the  
>> past. However, this may be a good opportunity to reconsider? For myself,  
>> as happy end-user, would expect an option 'forward' (without) and 'forward  
>> with attachment'. Keybindings are again a problem, maybe use F and W resp.
> 
> Well, it does if you forward attached!  Forwarding inline something that  
> someone else sent to you as an attachment seems a bit perverse--won't it  
> often fill the screen with base-64-encoded stuff, or something equally  
> nasty?
> 
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> balsa-list mailing list
> balsa-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list