Re: Forwarding options



On 09/24/2003, Marco van Oostende wrote:
> I always wondered why forwarding a message with attachment  
> never included both the message -and- the attachments, as it  
> does in most other mail apps I worked with, but I'm sure that  
> is a result of a discussion from the past. However, this may be  
> a good opportunity to reconsider? For myself, as happy end- 
> user, would expect an option 'forward' (without) and 'forward  
> with attachment'. Keybindings are again a problem, maybe use F  
> and W resp.

Well, it does if you forward attached!  Forwarding inline  
something that someone else sent to you as an attachment seems a  
bit perverse--won't it often fill the screen with base-64-encoded  
stuff, or something equally nasty?

Peter



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]