Re: Problem with FccMRU

On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:45:04 Peter Bloomfield wrote:
> It's just possible that you had postponed a message with 1.3.6 and 
> retrieved it with 1.4.x. It's just speculation, but that looks like a 
> conceivable pathway for "Sentbox" to get into the url-list.

Yes very possible.

> Balsa doesn't discard an fcc-url when it fails to find the corresponding 
> mailbox, because it may become valid again (if a file is restored, or an 
> IMAP connection is made, for instance)--that's why this invalid one kept 
> being saved in the config. Being able to distinguish bad urls from valid 
> but unavailable ones would be nice. Perhaps we should make some minimal 
> check: currently, all mailbox urls begin with "file://", "imap://", or 
> "imaps://", which would have been enough to reject "Sentbox"!

Or perhaps alert the user that copying the mail to the sentbox failed?

Regards Martin Leopold.
Dept. of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]