Re: Problem with FccMRU

[Martin Leopold <mleopold worldonline dk>]

On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:45:04 Peter Bloomfield wrote:
> It's just possible that you had postponed a message with 1.3.6 and 
> retrieved it with 1.4.x. It's just speculation, but that looks like a 
> conceivable pathway for "Sentbox" to get into the url-list.

Yes very possible.

> Balsa doesn't discard an fcc-url when it fails to find the corresponding 
> mailbox, because it may become valid again (if a file is restored, or an 
> IMAP connection is made, for instance)--that's why this invalid one kept 
> being saved in the config. Being able to distinguish bad urls from valid 
> but unavailable ones would be nice. Perhaps we should make some minimal 
> check: currently, all mailbox urls begin with "file://", "imap://", or 
> "imaps://", which would have been enough to reject "Sentbox"!

Or perhaps alert the user that copying the mail to the sentbox failed?

-- 
Regards Martin Leopold.
Dept. of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen