Re: IMAP folders

[Carlos Morgado <chbm chbm nu>]

On 2001.06.18 17:32:40 +0100 Paolo Fiore wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Carlos Morgado" <chbm@chbm.nu>
> To: "Balsa List" <balsa-list@gnome.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 5:42 PM
> Subject: Re: IMAP folders
> >
> > i use ... whatever outlook came with w95
> 
> wow! you have just two changes, make your choice: ;)
corporate desktop. i mess with it as little as possible :)

> the free one: Outlook Express (with Internet Explorer)
> Outlook '95 or '97 or 2000 with MS Office
> oooops sorry, there's the Exchange client too!!!!!
> 
> I'm quite confotable your is the Express one; click on the "?" and then
> "About..."
it's not the express. it's the real one

> I'm talking about the "real" Outlook and btw it works via MAPI... it's
> completely different. I'll try the Express  too for your confor... ;)
>
no need. it's the real one. i'm thinking it's something deep in the server
that reflects both on MAPI and IMAP
 
> >
> > i mean like
> > + Public Folders
> >  |
> >  + All
> >   |
> >   + Some folder
> >    |
> >    + Foo
> >    + Bar
> >
> > When you click in Foo or Bar outlook stops for a bit, realizes they're
> folders
> > and makes the + disapear and shows it as a regular folder. this sounds
> > consistant
> > with the recent change to the code and not showing the messages
> 
> I cannot note the delay because I use a remote Exchange Server and I must
> wait dozens of seconds in any case!
> 
same lan here. i note when i click on the '+'

> However I'm seeing different behaviour; in your example when I click on
> (e.g.) Foo I can immediately see the contents on the right... any kind of
> item... messages, tasks, contacs ecc....
> I must click exactly on the "+" to see the sub-folders in the tree!!!!
> 
i don't see this on all folders, only a few. i should have mentioned it
earlier

> Let me point out that with Exchange any kind of folder can include again any
> kind of folder and so on; is not mandatory for Foo or Bar in your example
> being Mail folder, they could be (e.g.) Task folders and at the same time
> containing Mail sub-folders
> 

they're 'Public Folders' inside 'Public Folders'

> > > ==> Note: "Sent Item" via an IMAP folder... who do I have to bribe? ;)
> >
> > i have a long standing bug open on bugzilla.gnome.org. i never got around
> to
> > do it and don't have a clear picture of how to either. i don't think
> anyone
> > has atm :\
> 
> What do you mean with atm? The communication protocol? Matters?
> 
At The Moment :)

-- 
Carlos Morgado - chbm(at)chbm(dot)nu - http://chbm.nu/ -- gpgkey: 0x1FC57F0A
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ FP:0A27 35D3 C448 3641 0573 6876 2A37 4BB2 1FC5 7F0A
Software is like sex; it's better when it's free. - Linus Torvalds