[xslt] Extending EXSLT support to get the crypto part

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

 See bug #142105
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142105

doing so will add dependancies for libexslt to openssl when available
and as a side effect xsltproc will also depend on those.
Being able to compile libxslt/xsltproc without openssl being available
is of course a very important goal even if this feature is added.
Is there strong opposition from doing so ?
I don't think having libxml2 depend on openssl is a good idea (c.f.
the thread about adding https support to libxml2) but libexslt is 
a far more specialized library and doing so doesn't concern me.

  Unless serious concern being raised and once the configuration
stuff is being sorted out, I think I will make that change, so if
you have a strong feeling about this, please speak up :-)

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/