Re: [xml] Generating XML from Schema definitions (again, sorry)
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: Callum Gibson <callum_r_gibson yahoo com au>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] Generating XML from Schema definitions (again, sorry)
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 04:45:45 -0400
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 02:13:33PM +1000, Callum Gibson wrote:
As I'm discovering, XML Schema is clearly defined by a committee and every
man and his dog has had a say in having his favourite syntax added with
the result that there are often 3 ways to do the same thing. Luckily
oh, if only it was the case, you will also discover that the 3 ways
actually differs in obscure ways, meaning only a handful of people on
the planet actually understand the full spec, and are not necessarily from
the original group who 'designed' it...
Enjoy !
for me, our schemas were written mostly by a single person who has been
quite consistent in their approach and there are only a few exceptions
where someone has extended the original schema and not stuck to the same
methodology.
That's good, you're lucky !
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]