Re: [xml] redicting parts of trees
- From: Kasimier Buchcik <kbuchcik 4commerce de>
- To: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- Cc: "xml gnome org" <xml gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [xml] redicting parts of trees
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 23:00:54 +0200
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 16:52 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 10:28:23PM +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
Is slowly boils down to using just the xmlReconciliateNs mechanism
to declare all missing ns-declarations on the given node, as Daniel
first suggested - although you have been warned ;-)
I'm not the one this API is designed for, so I will refrain from
getting in the choices unless I see something which would be too
dangerous to put in the API. I'm happy to see the 3 main consumers
of that API firmly discussing the options and fully understanding
the scope of the problem. You just need to not forgot ID/REF in the
Ah, right ID/IDREF: maybe we need an additional traversal before any
attempt to adopt can be done; so reject the node if this constraint
is violated. Would be a mess to stop somewhere in the branch.
Any ideas here?
picture. And I will check code sanity too :-). I'm off but not far
away :-)
Daniel
Good to hear!
Regards,
Kasimier
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]