Re: [xml] Some tarball questions

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 03:29:26PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >  Yes that's something I wonder about. Except differences
> > in configuration option, it's bizarre. One possibility might
> > be that the order of the functions is not the same which can come
> > from the order of the functions in the hash tables, which can be
> > python version dependant but will not change the semantic of the
> > generated file.
>
> This is exactly what happens, after a deeper search.

  Not a big deal, maybe those should be ordered in generator.py

> Basically, the CLEANFILES thing is the automake way of doing what you 
> did with your clean target override, and gets used in *all* the clean 
> targets (including distclean), contrary to the clean target override 
> (distclean doesn't call clean).
> Note that I added the libxml2class.txt file in the GENERATED list 
> because it is actually generated and did not get removed properly.

  Well libxml2class.txt is purely informative, it is not used for anything.
Applied, thanks,

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/