Re: [xml] Re: [gnomemm] ANNOUNCE: libxml++ is now sane.

[Sean Chittenden <sean chittenden org>]

> > > > I, too, have an API enhancement suggestion: Please consider a
> > > > method 'Node::lookup(const std::string &xpath)' that does an
> > > > xpath lookup (surprize !) and returns a NodeSet. I'v written
> > > > my own C++ wrapper around libxml2 and this method is
> > > > incredibly useful in my work...
> > >
> > > Seconded, I did that for the Python bindings too and use it
> > > everywhere It's extremely convenient.
> >
> > The ruby API uses the method 'find' and accepts an xpath
> > expression.  Could we standardize all of these language bindings
> > on a single name?
>
>   Hum, that would be "evaluate" <grin/>
>     http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-XPath/xpath.html#XPathEvaluator

That's a funky name... is this what's in use by the rest of the other
lanugage bindings?  -sc

-- 
Sean Chittenden