|
Steinar, please excuse me for butting in.
> I think you're wrong, I'm part of that working group handling > xml-editor w3 org feedback, and I'm concerned that the wording might > not be clear enough, that's all ! The words are clear enough. The problem is that they do not
correspond with the EBNF productions:
Production 14 should *probably* be defined in terms of Char
which is defined in production 2:
Dave.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Veillard" <veillard redhat com> To: "Steinar Bang" <sb dod no> Cc: <xml gnome org> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 2:47 PM Subject: Re: [xml] Re: Is it possible to skip illegal UTF-8 characters when parsing? > On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 03:38:28PM +0200, Steinar Bang wrote: > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#charsets > > > > Yes. Production [2] is the production used in both comments and CDATA > > sections, but as far as I can tell, not in CharData. > > "A parsed entity contains text, a sequence of characters," > > all the content processed by a parser comes from parsed entities, > and production [2] specifies what are the allowed ranges. > > > If you think I'm right about this error, and if you think it is > > important enough, I can put in a message to xml-editor w3 org > > > > If I'm wrong, there is no point in bothering them about it. > > I think you're wrong, I'm part of that working group handling > xml-editor w3 org feedback, and I'm concerned that the wording might > not be clear enough, that's all ! > > Daniel > > -- > Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ > veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ > http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ > _______________________________________________ > xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ > xml gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml > |