Re: Comments on 1.0pre3, part 1



If nobody raises objections against the proposed changes, I could 
try to produce a pre4 version in the next few days. Before I start
doing so, I would like to hear your opinion on the second part of
my comments, though ? Do you think something like this should be 
part of the spec ? If so, should it be an introduction or an appendix ?

Matthias
 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
To: <Sasha_Vasko osca state mo us>
Cc: <wm-spec-list gnome org>; Matthias Clasen <Matthias Clasen poet de>
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 16:08
Subject: Re: Comments on 1.0pre3, part 1


> 
> Hi,
> 
> Any volunteers to actually merge these comments into the SGML
> document as appropriate? It's not very hard.
> 
> Havoc





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]