Re: Comments on 1.0pre3, part 1

[Sasha_Vasko osca state mo us]

> OK, no problem. May I propose to change the description to
>
> "Two cardinals specifying the common size of all desktops."


Sounds perfect to me.


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Sasha_Vasko osca state mo us>
> To: <wm-spec-list gnome org>; Matthias Clasen <Matthias Clasen poet de>
> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 15:51
> Subject: Re: Comments on 1.0pre3, part 1
>
>
> >
> > > Here is a list of comments on 1.0pre3.
> > >
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > 2.4 _NET_DESKTOP_GEOMETRY
> > >
> > > Should read
> > >
> > > _NET_DESKTOP_GEOMETRY width, height, CARDINAL[][2]/32
> >
> > No it should not, since geometry of all the desktops is supposed to be
the
> > same.
> > Description is misleading in that sense, and has to be fixed, as was
noted
> > several times before.
> >
> > I don't know, may be somebody will prove me wrong but I do not see any
use
> > for differemnt desktop geometry for each desktop, except for the code
> > overcomplication.
> >
> > Viewport position on the contrary should be on the per-desktop basis,
as
> > user should be
> > able to come back to the same viewport he/she last seen on the desk.
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> > Sasha Vasko
> >
> >
>