Re: Comments on 1.0pre3, part 1

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

"Matthias Clasen" <Matthias Clasen poet de> writes:
> If nobody raises objections against the proposed changes, I could 
> try to produce a pre4 version in the next few days. Before I start
> doing so, I would like to hear your opinion on the second part of
> my comments, though ? Do you think something like this should be 
> part of the spec ? If so, should it be an introduction or an appendix ?
> 

I would say the spec itself should contain enough context and
rationale to make the intent clear. I don't know what others think
though. Any opinions?

Havoc