Re: [Vala] Using Gir instead of vapi (and bug 624923)



On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:24:33PM +0100, Abderrahim Kitouni wrote:
> في خ، 23-12-2010 عند 11:39 +0100 ، كتب Luca Bruno:
> > > http://abderrahim.arablug.org/tmp/anjutagirs.tbz2
> > 
> > When generating ianjuta-3.0 I get:
> > IAnjuta-3.0.gir:26.5-26.72: error: The base type `void*` of struct
> > `IAnjuta.BuilderHandle` is not a struct
> >     <alias name="BuilderHandle" c:type="IAnjutaBuilderHandle">
> I forgot the metadata file, it's attached :-)

Fixed in switch-to-gir, no need for a metadata. Would you try it?

> > This need a fix, did you work on it already? By the way why you want Anjuta
> > and IAnjuta in the same .vapi?
> Because it's more vala-ish : in vala each (pkg-config) package has one
> vapi, so that's what I'm doing (and that's what I have been doing with
> gidl, by concatenating the vapis).
> 
> >  They have different namespaces while in vala,
> > at least for now, you can only have one gir namespace per file.
> I see this as a bug that needs to be solved eventually :-)

I feel this can be only fixed when introspection starts supporting
multiple namespaces.

-- 
http://www.debian.org - The Universal Operating System

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]