Re: [Utopia] [patch] gvm property name changes

[Ed Mack <lists edmack com>]

> My point was to reserve the capability 'camera' to bus devices that
> actually represent hardware objects with a lens, e.g. digital cameras.
> Which makes it a lot easier to draw a meaningful device-tree when it
> comes to e.g. selecting icons.

If a user plugs in a camera that acts as a usb-storage device, surely
they would expect to see a camera icon? A usb storage device with a lot
of pictures on it is a proper candidate for content.photos, but a usb
storage device with a DCIM tree should be marked with camera capability.
I think that makes more sense from the user perspective.

In the end, gphoto2 should show them all anyway.