Re: [Usability]Keeping the Quit menu item
- From: Julien Olivier <julo altern org>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Joshua Adam Ginsberg <joshg myrealbox com>, Dave Bordoley <bordoley pilot msu edu>, usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Usability]Keeping the Quit menu item
- Date: 19 Mar 2003 23:16:37 +0100
Le mer 19/03/2003 à 22:58, Havoc Pennington a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 10:54:40PM +0100, Julien Olivier wrote:
> > > There's no user-visible concept of a process.
> > >
> >
> > Not that I want to be sarcastic but there is a user-visible concept of a
> > process: when an app crashes, all the windows that use its process die
> > with it. In such a case, users can see that these windows belonged to
> > the same process. And most of the time they get frustrated because they
> > don't find it logical to have windows dying because of a crash of
> > another window.
>
> Well, by that argument all windows should be a separate process, so
> you wouldn't need a Quit menu.
>
> But the only real conclusion here is "crashes are not
> user-explainable, and we should try to keep them from happening"
>
Yes, I agree. I'd even say that the robustness of an app should be
proportional to the number of windows that usually share its process.
There is no worst thing than having all your work lost because of a
crash in 1 window.
> Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]