Re: Fwd: Re: [Usability]File renaming/extensions [chbm chbm nu]



On 2002.08.20 15:53:23 +0100 David Lazaro wrote:
> there is no need of filesystem support for this so it doesn't belong
there.
> it also makes for happy fun b0rkage like "i'm reading the mime-type from
> the filesystem but did the other app update it or am i reading crap ?"

Have you read the report at namesys.com? It would bring much more
features that should have been on computers a long long time ago...

some time ago, yes. reiser discovered the "fs is a db" paradigm.
good for him. i'm not a big fan of the church of reiser.

> unix solved this long ago. the solution is called magic numbers. sensible
> formats have magic numbers. those who don't need to be replaced.
> i like the way gmc can find my jpegs even if i don't moronicaly name them
> foo.jpg

You are right, extensions are not needed. So way does almost every
application depend on them, nowadays?


i can't think of any offhand ..

--
Carlos Morgado - chbm(at)chbm(dot)nu - http://chbm.nu/ -- gpgkey: 0x1FC57F0A
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ FP:0A27 35D3 C448 3641 0573 6876 2A37 4BB2 1FC5 7F0A
Software is like sex; it's better when it's free. - Linus Torvalds



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]