Re: [Usability] Ctl+W
- From: David Moles <david moles vykor com>
- To: Calum Benson <calum benson sun com>
- Cc: usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Usability] Ctl+W
- Date: 12 Dec 2001 09:00:23 -0800
On Wed, 2001-12-12 at 06:51, Calum Benson wrote:
> Telsa Gwynne wrote:
>
> > Seriously? I've been skipping through this thread secure in the
> > knowledge that I thought I saw "Don't use these as keybindings:
> > they may not been used in this scheme, but they are expected by
> > emacs-key-binding users and should not be used for other things"
> > (with a list of bindings I use a lot, although I don't use emacs).
>
> There is indeed a section in the draft UI Guidelines to that effect,
> which lists all the current emacs keybindings in common use in GNOME and
> suggests you don't use them for anything else while a text field has
> focus. I included that because I was still hearing conflicting stories
> from the gtk team at that point about whether they would be switched off
> by default or not... still not sure I've heard the definitive answer!
>
> > My ideal scenario would be something along the lines of a
> > dialogue for:
> >
> > Choose keybindings:
> >
> > Emacs style
> > Windows style
> > MacOS style
> > CDE style
>
> This might work for text-editing/navigation keybindings, but probably
> not much else. When app developers add a shortcut key to their new app
> for a particular function, they can't be expected to have to pick one
> dynamically at runtime so as not to collide with whatever scheme the
> user currently employs. If nothing else, think of the documentation
> nightmare :)
What about things like switching between Ctrl-, Alt-, and (on the Mac)
Cmd- as the primary menu hotkey? Netscape used to let you do that, IIRC.
--D
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]