Re: [Tracker] Feedback for 0.5.0
- From: Erlend Davidson <E R M Davidson sms ed ac uk>
- Cc: tracker-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Tracker] Feedback for 0.5.0
- Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:23:42 +0000
Laurent Aguerreche wrote:
Le samedi 21 octobre 2006 Ã 10:41 +0100, Erlend Davidson a Ã©crit :
On 20 Oct 2006, at 10:02, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
2006/10/20, Jamie McCracken <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk>:
Erlend Davidson wrote:
>>> What does tracker-search-tool actually require in terms
>>> dependencies? Would gnome-desktop do?
>> gnome-desktop gnome-vfs and gconf including dev packages
> Is it possible to make any of the gnome-stuff optional, or
is it better
> that other desktop-environments just write their own GUI's
> tracker's API (or command-line interface)?
the gnome stuff is optional - it wont build it if you dont
It could be cool to have a small qt4 demo app in the tree too.
Perhaps I should look a bit into that (as if I had any time -
bleh!). Anyways, could be cool - if I am correctly informed the qt
dbus bindings should be relatively stable no?
It might help adoption of your program, if you get the kde users
I totally agree with you!
I'm actually an Xfce user, using the tracker-search-tool. I experience
1. I cannot open files by double-clicking on them in the search-tool, I get:
"There is no viewer capable of displaying the document"
Gnome doesn't know which viewer to use :-(, however I'm not sure how to
2. I cannot use the open-folder feature because I do not have nautilus
installed. Would it be possible to use xdg-utils so that
tracker-search-tool doesn't depend on a particular file-manager?
] [Thread Prev