Re: pending patches

["martin bonnin" <martinbonnin gmail com>]

2008/10/9 Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>

On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 18:34 +0200, Sergio Villar Senin wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> martin bonnin escribiu:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2008/10/9 Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be <mailto:spam pvanhoof be>>
> >
> >     Would it be possible to make all of the approved ones apply without
> >     failed hunks?
> >

These patches have been committed:

[PATCH_02_18]_Give_tny_folder_store_get_folders_a_refresh_parameter.patch

[PATCH_03_18]_New_observer_behaviour.patch

[PATCH_05_18]_Attempt_to_fix_the_queue_account_refcount.patch

[PATCH_06_18]_Fix_ref_leak_with_the_iter_store.patch

[PATCH_07_18]Add_tny_camel_queue_stop.patch

[PATCH_11_18]_Add_tny_camel_send_queue_new_with_folders.patch

[PATCH_15_18]_In_TnyCamelFolder_don_t_emit_folder_store_change.patch

Let's get the remaining ones reviewed and then committed too

Remaining are patches 10/18 and 12/18. They both add an observer-mixin object, which is to decide whether it has to be public or not. I don't know the details good enough to decide. What I can tell is that I have been using the MergeFolderStore without problem for some time now.

Regards,

--
Martin