Re: pending patches

[Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>]

On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 18:34 +0200, Sergio Villar Senin wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> 
> martin bonnin escribiu:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > 2008/10/9 Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be <mailto:spam pvanhoof be>>
> > 
> >     Would it be possible to make all of the approved ones apply without
> >     failed hunks?
> > 

These patches have been committed:

[PATCH_02_18]_Give_tny_folder_store_get_folders_a_refresh_parameter.patch
[PATCH_03_18]_New_observer_behaviour.patch
[PATCH_05_18]_Attempt_to_fix_the_queue_account_refcount.patch
[PATCH_06_18]_Fix_ref_leak_with_the_iter_store.patch
[PATCH_07_18]Add_tny_camel_queue_stop.patch
[PATCH_11_18]_Add_tny_camel_send_queue_new_with_folders.patch
[PATCH_15_18]_In_TnyCamelFolder_don_t_emit_folder_store_change.patch

Let's get the remaining ones reviewed and then committed too

> > 
> > Actually, the important patch is
> > [PATCH_03_18]_New_observer_behaviour.patch, which changes quite a lot of
> > code. With this one the others apply correctly.
> > There was some conversation between Sergio and Rob at some point about
> > this patch but cannot tell what the conclusion was. Sergio, is this
> > patch ok for you now ?
> 
> Yes, I forgot to answer Rob's reply, his explanations are OK for me.


-- 
Philip Van Hoof, freelance software developer
home: me at pvanhoof dot be 
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org 
http://pvanhoof.be/blog
http://codeminded.be