Re: Tinymail patches

[Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen err no>]

* 

(no need to Cc me, I'm subscribed.)

| > We are using NM, yes.  I must confess to not really 
| > understanding what libconic is and does, except it seems to 
| > have a certain overlap with what NM.
| > 
| > I don't really want us to have to maintain a separate tree 
| > along the lines of -olpc or -gpe, but if that's what it 
| > takes, I guess we'll have to bite that bullet.
| 
| As I said, apart from the TnyDevice implementation (which
| uses libconic), there is very little interesting or maemo
| specific in libtinymail-maemo.

Ok.  Has anybody started on a TnyDevice implementation for NM?  I
presume that's needed for full GNOME desktop integration.

| The only reason to use TnyMaemoConicDevice is for compiling
| the Modest email program. It would require some work there
| to work on top of a TnyDevice which uses NM instead.

Yes, modest is what we are really interested in here.  I suspect that
also needs some hacking to work correctly with a
TnyNetworkManagerDevice?

-- 
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are