FW: RE: Re: Icons in the wininfo when cycling
- From: Christopher Bratusek <zanghar freenet de>
- To: Sawfishlist <sawfish-list gnome org>
- Subject: FW: RE: Re: Icons in the wininfo when cycling
- Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:58:36 +0100
Sorry, my webmailer doesn't understand Reply-To...
> -----weitergeleitete Nachricht-----
> Von: Christopher Bratusek
> Gesendet: Di. 02.02.10 (09:45)
> An: Teika Kazura
> Betreff: RE: Re: Icons in the wininfo when cycling
>
> There's similar code in merlin, but that code does have several
> extra options (awfully doesn't always get an icon), for example size
> of the icon or paths to look icons for. For the patches... well we
> could simply add a staging/ directory into HEAD and place all those
> patches there (with subdirs, say: stable/testing/unstable or such).
>
> [And yeah, I know I wanted to improve jump-or-exec almost 2 weeks
> ago, but I haven't yet found the time, but from the 15th until the
> 18th I've got 1 week holidays so at last then I've got time to work
> on it (I'll then also complete GtkListStore/GtkTreeView in rep-gtk
> and try to update SawfishConfig, furthermore I want to do some
> changes to the SawfishPager, but those changes are not yet clearly
> defined nor coded, but I want it to look nicer)]
>
> Chris
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Teika Kazura
> > Gesendet: Di. 02.02.10 (08:49)
> > An: sawfish-list gnome org
> > Betreff: Re: Icons in the wininfo when cycling
> >
> > On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 21:02:06 -0800, dmg wrote:
> > > wouldn't be a good idea to stash [patch in icon] in branches in
> the
> > > git repo?
> >
> > It may be due to my limited skill in git, but I don't think so,
> since
> > * branch cannot have annotation.
> > * tag is poor.
> >
> > Furthermore, at least from command line, there's no way to cleanly
> > manage 10 branches. (One global namespace for branches and tags.)
> > I put prefix to my local branches like "done/" for pushed,
> > "work/" for my own ordinary branches, "cont/" for branch which
> > prefers
> > repeated "commit --amend" like doc fix, etc. But it's ugly way.
> >
> > On the other hand, in wiki there're only 4 related pages,
> > "Proposed goals", "Long term todos", "Snippets", and "Scripts".
> >
> > You can give readable notes (bold, link, etc), and when it gets
> > complicated, you can classify things there.
> >
> > > at least the code does not get lost
> >
> > Currently, I'm watching the mailing list. I put a link to ML
> archive
> > in wiki if it can't be handled immediately, like this icon patch,
> so
> > there's no fear of loss. If things are not processed yet, they're
> > unread yet, or stashed in my mailboxes like "teika/keep",
> > "teika/technical", etc. I haven't forgotten your patches. Don't
> > worry. :)
> >
> > # I've worked a lot recently in ML, and I have 70 mails left in my
> > # sawfish mailbox. But 30 of them are sent by me.
> >
> > That's why I can't write much code. Most of time is spent in ML.
> >
> > Well, the problem is the wiki is pooly organized, and people don't
> > look
> > at wiki so much.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Teika (Teika kazura)
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht Ende-----
>
>
>
> Gratis: Jeden Monat 3 SMS versenden-
> Mit freenetMail - Ihrer kostenlose E-Mail-Adresse
> http://email.freenet.de/dienste/emailoffice/produktuebersicht/basic/sms/index.html?pid=6830
>
>
> -----weitergeleitete Nachricht Ende-----
Heute schon ge"freeMail"t?
Jetzt kostenlose E-Mail-Adresse sichern!
http://email.freenet.de/dienste/emailoffice/produktuebersicht/basic/mail/index.html?pid=6831
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]