Am Montag, den 21.09.2009, 17:18 -0500 schrieb Jeremy Hankins: > Timo Korvola <Timo Korvola iki fi> writes: > > On Tuesday 22 September 2009 00:40:48 Timo Korvola wrote: > > >> As an Emacs user I would prefer "Bindings" to "Shortcuts". > >> Unfortunately "Shortcuts" may well be the most intuitively obvious > >> term for new users, > > > > On second thought, these days Sawfish probably has more appeal for the > > average Emacs user than for the average user of KDE / Gnome / whatever, > > so "Bindings" may actually be more familiar to _our_ new users. > > Yes, particularly since "shortcuts" suggests that there's a more obvious > long method. In some environments (KDE / Gnome / whatever) that more > obvious long method would be some arcane series of menu clicks[1], but > in sawfish the keybindings aren't just short ways of accessing menu > structures. > > > So the only term that hasn't been changed but perhaps should be is > > "Matched Windows". John's "Window Rules" is perhaps even better than > > "Window-Specific" from KDE. > > I like "Window Rules." > > > [1] Hmmm... I may be letting my biases show here. ;) > Window Rules is accepted. Awaiting some more votes on other strings. Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil