Re: Marks module in misleading place, so moved; ,maybe license issues

zanghar freenet de (2009-02-07 at 0837.29 +0100):
> Am Samstag, den 07.02.2009, 02:02 +0100 schrieb GSR - FR:
> > Hi:
> > 
> > I see tabs were commited... and marks with it. But I do not see why
> > have marks under tabs. The mark module is perfectly valid contrib on
> > itself, limiting it to tabs does not sound fair, so I moved it to
> > util, and updated current tabs to match. Think about moving a handful
> > of windows from one workspace to another, for example.
> > 
> Fine. Do you think, that marks could be used in other places, too?

See last line of paragraph. I guess that by proper keymap trickery we
can have a prefix command "do next in the marked windows" so next
command is applied to all them instead of a single one. Let's say W-p
is that keybinding, and W-F1 moves a windows to workspace 1, then W-p
(show a dialog like the "Quote" one here) W-F1 would move all marked
windows to workspace 1. This would save users the need to create all
kind of bindings that are copies of theirs normal ones plus "on the
marked windows".

Sorry about the ChangeLog, I had put the info in the svn log. I had
forgot we still use that even if not in a per commit basis but more
like per day.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]