Re: Marks module in misleading place, so moved; ,maybe license issues

Am Samstag, den 07.02.2009, 02:02 +0100 schrieb GSR - FR:
> Hi:
> I see tabs were commited... and marks with it. But I do not see why
> have marks under tabs. The mark module is perfectly valid contrib on
> itself, limiting it to tabs does not sound fair, so I moved it to
> util, and updated current tabs to match. Think about moving a handful
> of windows from one workspace to another, for example.

Fine. Do you think, that marks could be used in other places, too?

> I was even considering changing all terms from "mark" to "select", as
> that is what I would think first when picking windows to do something
> with a group, but I guess that can be misleading too, just in
> different sense (people would probably expect any new command invoked
> to work on selection), so I keep it as "marks".
> I also updated the header of marks.jl, assuming the wiki page is
> correct and this file is covered by GPLv3 or later. Please, everyone,
> for next contribs, update licenses, docs and other inline comments.




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]