On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 09:44:39PM +0100, Janek Kozicki wrote: > Josie Imlay said: (by the date of Thu, 6 Mar 2008 06:08:26 -0700) > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Peter Weilbacher <newsspam weilbacher org> wrote: > > > > > Would it not be better to just integrate the sawfish pager into the normal > > > sawfish tarball for the next version? Then you could make its activation > > > also an option in the UI configuration panel. > > > Peter. > > > Yes please. > > > > I think maintaining the source for the sawfish pager in the main > > repository so that it's in every future checkout and release is an > > excellent idea. This would have saved me several headaches in the > > past. > > > Hello, > > I like this idea too. If we add sawfish-pager into main SVN of > sawfish it would be simpler for everyone. > > What do others think? There's two separate ideas here. One is to put -pager into the sawfish svn. That I agree with, since they are such related projects. The other one is to make -pager a part of the sawfish release. That I don't like, at least for the time being. Sawfish's build system is convoluted enough that putting -pager into it sounds like it might bring trouble. Robert Personen is working on that, and after it gets cleaned up it might me worth revisiting the idea, but meanwhile it would just be easier for everyone involved to keep it a separate tarball.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature