Re: Themer moved from trunk to sawfish-themer branch

Am Dienstag, den 29.07.2008, 00:49 -0600 schrieb Scott Scriven:
* Christopher Bratusek <nano-master gmx de> wrote:
> it's ok to remove the themer from trunk.
> ... grab the new sawfish-themer branch:
> svn co

There's just one issue with this.  The themer isn't a branch of 
sawfish.  I know svn allows this sort of thing, but it's not 
really what the trunk/tags/branches system is intended for, and 
it might make things a little messy if/when the repository gets 
converted to a DVCS.

A well-named directory under trunk is probably a better place.

-- Scott

It's not just the themer inside the sawfish-themer branch, it's a copy of
the whole trunk @ rev4225, which still includes the themer. I thought this is what
branches are for?


GNOME/Sawfish rule!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]