Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Multi User Rhythmbox
- From: Michael Knepher <mknepher bluethingy com>
- To: David Berg <drberg1000 gmail com>
- Cc: rhythmbox-devel gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Multi User Rhythmbox
- Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 09:04:46 -0700
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 07:33 -0500, David Berg wrote:
> On 6/4/06, Joel Plane <joel plane gmail com> wrote:
> > You could try this:
> >
> > Ctrl+Alt+2 to get to tty2 assuming its not being used. Log in as your
> > 'music' user.
> >
> > startx -e rhythmbox -- :1
> >
> > then you could use Ctrl+Alt+7 and Ctrl+Alt+8 to switch between you
> > normal session and the newly created rhythmbox session.
>
> I've alreay thought of this and may go this route but would prefer to
> keep it within my own session and not have to switch terminals to
> change playlists or see what song is playing.
What about setting up a streaming server that would allow you to use a
browser interface to control the music? Just add the stream to rhythmbox
as a new Internet Radio source. Personally, I run slimserver
(http://www.slimdevices.com). Your wife could then change songs, stop
the stream, etc., from a browser, without having to have access to your
rhythmbox process.
>
> --Dave
>
> >
> > I hope this helps.
> >
> > Joel.
> >
> >
> > David Berg wrote:
> >
> > > On 6/4/06, Jonathan Matthew <jonathan kaolin wh9 net> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:08:45AM -0500, David Berg wrote:
> > >> > On our family computer I often start a play list then leave the room
> > >> > with it running which tends to really bother my wife since she can't
> > >> > then skip a particular song, change the playlist or put in a movie for
> > >> > the kids.
> > >> >
> > >> > I was hoping that I could remidy the situation by creating a user
> > >> > music that would run rhythmbox. The idea being that we could both
> > >> > have access to processes owned by the this user and control each
> > >> > other's playlists. This would work if I give the music user its own
> > >> > session but I would much rather beable to control it from within my
> > >> > session. Unfortunately, if I try to launch a second instance of
> > >> > rhythmbox then the second instance immediately closes unexpectedly.
> > >> > Is there a way to work around this? If not, how hard would it be to
> > >> > impliment? I'd be willing to tweak the code if its not to hard and
> > >> > someone points me in the right direction.
> > >>
> > >> It's not really clear how your setup works or why running rhythmbox as
> > >> a different user would help. I'm not sure what the actual problem is.
> > >
> > >
> > > The problem is that if I start a playlist then let the screen lock
> > > with the music playing, my wife can't stop or change what is on. I'd
> > > like to be able to allow her to do so. I'm not sure what the best way
> > > to do this would be, but if there were a way she could control my
> > > rhythmbox process or we could both control a shared process that would
> > > work well.
> > >
> > > Example: I launch rhythmbox, start a play list then go about doing
> > > something else. She decides she doesn't like what I chose to play,
> > > launches an instance of rhythmbox in her session which is tied to my
> > > library and process. Then she can skip a song in the playlist I
> > > started, start a new playlist, etc.
> > >
> > > Running rhythmbox as a separte user probably isn't necessary in this
> > > case but may be in others where security is more important.
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Armed with my lack of knowledge of your setup, I'm going to suggest
> > >> running rhythmbox in a stripped down session for some user inside a vnc
> > >> server, so your other users can connect to that to control it. I'm not
> > >> sure of the best way of setting this up, or which of the 37 different
> > >> vnc servers is best to use.
> > >
> > >
> > > This may work, but seems like an awful lot of hassle. I guess I would
> > > like to see something like a rhythmbox daemon and rhythmbox clients.
> > > Allowing a user to select who can control the daemon and that would
> > > also make streams available over the network yet keep accounting
> > > information on song popularity.
> > >
> > >
> > > Is this clearer?
> > >
> > >
> > > --Dave
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rhythmbox-devel mailing list
> > > rhythmbox-devel gnome org
> > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rhythmbox-devel mailing list
> > rhythmbox-devel gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> rhythmbox-devel mailing list
> rhythmbox-devel gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]