Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Re: rhythmbox: gstreamer vs xine
- From: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <kenneth gnu org>
- To: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- Cc: Miguel Freitas <miguel cetuc puc-rio br>,thomas urgent rug ac be, rhythmbox-devel gnome org,xine-devel sourceforge net
- Subject: Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Re: rhythmbox: gstreamer vs xine
- Date: 14 Jan 2003 13:36:06 +0100
> That's something that's possible pretty easily, if we split up xine-lib
> to allow that. The main problem would be to identify which plugins are
> "free" and which ones are problematic wrt. Copyrights and Patents.
Well, we could let xine-lib include the same plug-ins as Red Hat
distribute for Gstreamer. Then we can ask Red Hat if there are other
plug-ins they think are OK to distribute and add these as well.
> Totem already contains code to warn you if the video or audio isn't
> supported. Would just need to add a mention of where to get a
> full-fledged version.
That is really great! Does it also mention what type (codec-wise) is
missing?
We really need a www.multimedia.org page where we could distribute
plug-ins for xine, gstreamer and xmms. That would make it all a lot
easier for people. :)
"You are needing the »MP3 (xine)« codec in order to play the current
file. For a list of extra plug-ins, please visit
»www.multimedia.org/plug-ins/xine«"
Kenneth
--
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <kenneth@gnu.org>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]