Re: Relicensing Nautilus to GPLv3+

[Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>]

On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 11:13 -0400, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> There are few by error.
> The important cases are lineup-parameters used for uncrustify, and
> the threatics part from gnome-builder.
> However, we already spent time on implementing our own thing in the
> past with git-archive-all (GPLv3+) when meson couldn't handle it, so
> I would like to prevent this from happening again and avoid us the
> work with asking few upstreams to relicense based on our needs, and
> rather switch to GPL3+ where most of the tools are.

I don't understand what git-archive-all has to do with this. Is the
problem that some of the tools you ship are GPLv3? That doesn't mean
the rest of the module has to be...