Re: session saving support status
- From: Lucas Rocha <lucasr gnome org>
- To: Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>
- Cc: Gnome Release Team <release-team gnome org>
- Subject: Re: session saving support status
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 22:59:23 +0000
Hi Matthias,
2009/3/4 Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>:
> So, session saving is back...almost..
> After building gnome-session 2.25.92 earlier today, I gave the
> resurrected session saving support a spin (thanks, Lucas !).
>
> While it does in fact save a bunch of desktop files in
> ~/.gnome2/gnome-session/saved-session and loads them when I log in
> again, it does not actually work remotely well enough to advertise
> this as a 2.26 feature in its current state.
Thanks for testing! :-)
> - compiz did not come back at all
How does the saved .desktop file look like? Does it have a sane Exec?
> - with metacity, all windows ended up crammed on one workspace
Metacity is not returning a valid restart command for some reason. So,
the saved .desktop file has Exec=metacity.
> - only one of my terminal windows came back
gnome-terminal is not using eggsmclient which doesn't behave exactly
like GnomeClient. The session handling gnome-terminal is probably
broken because of this (wild guess).
> - tomboy opens a search window (why is this applet (!) session managed
> in the first place ?)
Yeah, it shouldn't be session managed at all.
> - firefox asks to restore the session instead of just restoring it
Yeah, same thing happens with epiphany.
> - having gedit open brings up the "app still running" dialog at logout
Bug #553168
> - gedit does not come back with previously opened files
Again, gedit started to use eggsmclient which doesn't behave the same
way than GnomeClient.
> - the "remember now" button in the capplet does nothing
Oops, totally forgot to implement this :-P
> Do we have hope to get any of this into working condition for 2.26 ?
I'll do a full investigation on those issues. My wild guess is that
most of those issues are per-application, not in session manager. I
may well be wrong. Let's see.
--lucasr
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]