Re: anjuta module inclusion.

["Luis Villa" <luis tieguy org>]

Oy. I'd have thought we'd have learned from the epiphany/firefox thing
that sometimes (in the case of extremely complex, highly-specialized
software) it is better to cut your losses and piggyback on an existing
popular Free project than to go it ourselves, but I haven't been
following the thread. :/

Luis

On Jan 9, 2008 4:16 PM, Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net> wrote:
> after vuntz and bkor had explicitly asked again on d-d-l for feedback on
> anjuta, we have seen some mostly positive responses.
>
> yesterday's log from #release-team:
> Jan 08 15:37:19 <andre> enough positive noise, a not-totally-convinced
> +1 for anjuta from my side now, if i should be the blocking guy :)
> Jan 08 15:40:36 <vuntz> thinking the same
> Jan 08 19:47:31 <bkor>  +1 from me as well for anjuta
>
> so if nobody contradicts really quickly, anjuta will be in, but i
> propose an explicit request to *translators* to file translation bugs
> against it, if something is unclear or hard to translate.
>
> andre
> --
>  mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
>  http://www.iomc.de/  | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
>
> _______________________________________________
> release-team mailing list
> release-team gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
>
>