Re: Moving Gtk2-Perl to GNOME infrastructure
- From: Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch gmx de>
- To: Olav Vitters <olav bkor dhs org>
- Cc: gnome-sysadmin gnome org, release-team gnome org
- Subject: Re: Moving Gtk2-Perl to GNOME infrastructure
- Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:33:29 +0200
Let's get going on this again.
Olav Vitters wrote:
>> Is your preference against a gnome-perl repository set in stone? If so,
>> how do you suggest we deal with the directories I mentioned in my
>> previous mail? To recap: we have a few things in our repository that
>> don't belong to one binding but rather to all of them:
> Unsure. While this layout might make sense from the possibilities of
> SVN; there will be some switch in future. Further, our infra isn't setup
> to support anything other than /branches,/trunk,/tags.
OK, I give in. Let's use separate SVN directories for every module:
The question then is what to do about the modules marked with *.
- perl-Cairo and perl-GStreamer and friends are bindings for stuff on the
freedesktop infrastructure. I'd still like to have them in the same place as
- perl-ExtUtils-Depends and perl-ExtUtils-PkgConfig are build-time helper
modules that are required by every module, so I'd like to keep them in the
same place as well.
>> docs/ - generic documentation applying to all our bindings
>> helpers/ - helper programs to aid developing bindings
We'll just host those on the website. They don't have to be version-controlled.
>> Makefile - a Makefile to build all or a subset of our bindings
Could be superseded by a jhbuild module set.
What do you think?
] [Thread Prev